A Letter to the 9/11 Conspiracy Seekers
("Truthers")
These notes
attempt to rebuff
the 9/11 conspiracy theories in a brief no-nonsense form, without
analyzing
grainy pictures or too many questionable facts. Is it possible to be
brief in
such a highly noisy informational field flooded with low level details
(true or
false) and various speculations? Attempts to examine each and every of
them
would inevitably inflate this document, diminishing the chances that
readers
follow it and think it through.
In general, it is
near
impossible to prove anything beyond one's direct and immediate
perception
to individuals preprocessed in a certain school of (mis-)education.
Why?
Because the raw information and misinformation abound, yet it is very
difficult
to set any formal rules how to sort it out - unless one is deeply
proficient in
the respective hard science. That is why things like "Holocaust
denial", the "No Moon landing", or the "9/11 internal
job" "theories" are so persistent in certain social strata.
The "9/11
internal
job" list of claims is not one and the same for all believers. Here I
am
trying to rebuff only the most wild of them. Some statements of the
government
report on the 9/11 may and must be reasonably doubted. There are things
which the
government did hide about the 9/11/2001, just as it did on say Oklahoma bombing. The
government definitely hid the depth of Islamic inroads into the US
power
structures, and also numerous cases of grotesque negligence which made
this
tragedy possible. Here I am analyzing only wildest of the "truthers"
claims.
Instead of
examining numerous
questionable direct facts or speculations flooding the
Internet, I am
going to consider rather indirect effects of a higher level, all being
self
evident.
Like in criminal
justice,
when confronting a scene of a terrible crime, in order to prosecute and
indict
a culprit, not only do you have to demonstrate direct links between the
culprit
and the crime. You must also produce a credible explanation of his motives
and goals: especially in a situation with scarce direct evidence.
- The 9/11 tragedy was definitely not a
"flag operation" for triggering anything like an all-out war or
global military campaign against Islamic world. Why? Because no
all-out war against Islamic world has yet happened. (The after
9/11 several months delayed campaign in Afghanistan with limited
conventional forces does not count). Alas: On 9/12/2001 Mecca and Medina were not nuked! Moslems in the US were not
rounded up! No mosques were burnt down on 9/12 anywhere in the US! On
the contrary: the US dhimmy-government took all measures to protect
mosques!!! And it is getting only worse: in fact, Islamization of
America advances in leap and bounds. Thus you have a "flag" of cosmic
proportion, yet no subsequent operation matching the "flag". The 9/11
was actually the opposite of what the euphemism "flag
operation" stands for, being in fact an "appeasement flag". Unlike say
the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, utilized by the American
government as a trigger to engage the sleeping country in an all-out
war, the 9/11 tragedy only embarrassed the US government not wishing to
acknowledge a state of war with Islam at all. (The US government did
wish however to whitewash itself and cover up its negligence in dealing
with several warnings about the threat of 9/11 from various
intelligence sources).
- To blame the US government for
orchestrating the 9/11 automatically means to absolve Islam and
to completely exclude Islam from the equation. It means refusal to see
that Islam in the US has already overpowered Christianity, that
Christianity is expelled while Islam has a green light. That Islam
controls the universities and schools, has penetrated into all layers
of government – up to enthroning a Moslem impostor Obama
as a US President. It means refusal to see tones
of evidences that Islam has been at war against the rest of the world
for millennia. That in the 20th century Islam was tremendously
empowered by the oil money, reactivating its war on the West
by all means. There were numerous Islamic attacks before the 9/11 and
after it such as those in Madrid, London, Moscow, Beslan, Bali, Bombay,
and just this recent one in Fort Hood – to name a few. It is
preposterous to single out the 9/11 out of this line for some twisted
reasons. One of motives of singling out the 9/11 is a deliberate
attempt to whitewash Islam and to blame Neo-Cons (read "Jews") instead.
- If it were a criminal government plot of
such a scale, the intelligence of other countries would figure it
out, and the internal opponents of Bush and of his government would
figure it out too. There is no significant state in the entire world
(except Iran) – friendly, unfriendly, hostile, secular,
or Islamic – which dares to claim anything else but the official
explanation of the 9/11. Not one significant media source – all
left-wing and anti-American! Bush haters in the Congress and a lot of
other politicians have been looking for every thing imaginable to
impeach Bush: how could they possibly not use this trump card?!! All
those hysterical Obamamaniacs: why didn't they bring this issue fore?
- If the crime goal were to simulate Islamic
attack on the high profile American targets, it would have been enough
that the planes hit the buildings – even if the buildings remained
standing. There would be absolutely no point for controlled
demolition later of anything on the scene at all.
- If the goal were that the billionaire-owner
of the properties collects the insurance in an arranged catastrophe,
which sense does it make for him to engage the government in such an
extremely complex implementation with 4 planes targeting also not
his properties (such as Pentagon).
- If the government (for whichever reason)
planned such an unprecedented mega-flag operation: which sense would it
make to combine the plot with criminal aspirations of some
billionaire? To compromise the secrecy for such a minute reason?
- If the goal were to destroy some
compromising documentation stored in Building 7, much more
plausible scenarios could be developed: No need in multiple plane
attacks. Why to set this spectacle with controlled demolition of
Building 7, never hit by Islamic skyjackers nor having any victims
inside? To impress whom? Not only is Building 7 redundant in this
scheme of things, but worse: betraying the "hidden" (demolition)
technique and giving a useful hint to all the "truth seekers"...
- How to keep the top secrecy when leaks
are happening all the time, and the operation like this would
require hundreds of top secret executives of various levels?
- Whatever reason it may be that the
government supposedly orchestrated this conspiracy, it must have been
worth it to them to cause so much suffering and loss of life. So if
there is any truth to this, the government wouldn't let a couple of
pecker-neck chumps to produce films, nor thousands others to promote
them and "disseminate the truth". What
are a few more lives of these trouble-makers to them to ensure the
success of this conspiracy?
- While considering physical systems of a
complexity such as scenes of the 9/11 tragedy, the truth seekers
demonstrate enviable willingness to apply physics. Yet this willingness
is hardly substantiated in the country, where the Physics is taught as
a one year optional high school course at best. As a result, these
critics are sincerely amazed that buildings collapse, well, exactly
vertically and almost in free fall.
- America has been the most advanced and the most
benign (if not intimidated!) benevolent superpower ever, the unique
successful social experiment, and the bright city on the hill. For
anybody who traveled and learned other countries and their history,
this must be an obvious fact. To assume that the US
government implemented the mega plot of a viciousness never known in
the history with no observable goal – requires a sick mind of the kind predicted
by Bezmenov.
It is one thing
to realize
that the US government during Clinton, Bush and now goes out of its
skin to
deny that Islam is at war against America (and the rest of the world).
Such a
denial was suicidal and criminal indeed because it involved suppression
of the
precious intelligence which could prevent the 9/11, and it
cultivated dhimmitude
at all levels. It was criminal as well to hide islamic traces in the
Oklahoma
bombing and of a few other suspicious plane crashes. And more
generally, it was
criminal indeed to open America for islamic immigration decades ago and
to keep
it now.
Yet it is quite different (and ugly)
thing to
blame the US government in orchestration of the 9/11.
The US government is guilty in denial of the war which Islam is waging
on us.
The "9/11 truthers" are in such denial too.
Alexander
Gofen