Mr. Obama always was and remains merely the pen with which at this moment others are charting the serpentine course for "the destruction of the U.S. Constitutional Republic" just as Bush, Clinton, and other real Presidents were only temporary figureheads on a ship of state they did not actually captain, sailing to a destination to which perhaps they were not even privy.
Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
It's
worse than conspiracy - it's consensus.
The
American
people, especially the patriotic ones, simply do not want to hear or
believe
any bad news about their country.
The New World Order international
The New World Order
(NWO) is a cumulative
expression for a vague and very narrow international party (an
International)
comprised of the most rich and powerful of this world, propagandeized
by Richard
Cobden and established by
Cecil
Rhodes in the Great
Britain (1800s).
Unlike the highest classes
in the past, concerned mostly about acquiring even more wealth and
power under
the then existing social order, this International also contemplates
various
ideas of changing the world (though not exactly in accordance with
Marx). Their
world goals spanned from the very "natural" things for their class such
as
increasing their profits (by exploiting semi-slave labor, unification,
and leveling all nations to
the lowest
standards), to various "progressive" and bizarre
causes which undermine the Judeo-Christian foundations of the
Western
nations, to nurturing regimes antithetical to the Judeo-Christian
values.
Organizations such as the Round Table Group, the Trilateral
Commission, the Conceal of Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Club
are their departments, and the UN and EU - their dear creatures.
Through them they
extend their cadre and influence into governments, education, and near
all
social institutions.
However the NWO activity of the recent
decades went far beyond bizarre (or profiteering) goals. Remaking of
the West being implemented now is absolutely unprecedented. The NWO
propaganda denies all the Western nations their right of
self-determination, forcefully repopulating them with the least
appropriate foreigners (islamic). The NWO
ideologues do away with the historic aspiration of all people to
self-determination and with the fundamental principle that "Nation X belongs to people X". In a
brilliant observation of E. M. Oblomov, what we see
now is not merely the so common inability
to learn from history, but it is a great unlearning of history of our
age! And it is the primary NWO organizations - the EU and the UN -
which effectuate this unlearning via such plans as "The replacement (!) migration" and the so called "UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and
Regular
Migration" doing away with nations of the West and
the white race.
Though initially
the globalism of the NWO differed from the "raw" Marxism (even if
feeding it now and then), the contemporary globalism literally turned into the next phase of
Marxism: from expropriating wealth of individuals to expropriating
wealth and territory of whole nations!
Robert
Bartley (the Wall Street
Journal), a free-trade zealot who championed a five-word amendment to
the Constitution: There shall be
open borders.
He also said: I think the
nation-state is finished.
Speaks Gary Allen:
Everyone knows that
Adolph Hitler
existed. The terror and destruction that this madman inflicted upon the
world
are universally recognized. Hitler came from a poor family which had
absolutely
no social position. He was a high school drop-out and nobody ever
accused him
of being cultured. Yet this man tried to conquer the world. During his
early
career he sat in a cold garret and poured onto paper his ambitions to
rule the
world. We know that.
Similarly,
we know that a man named Vladimir Ilich Lenin also existed. Like
Hitler, Lenin
did not spring from a family of social lions. The son of a petty
bureaucrat,
Lenin, who spent most of his adult life in poverty, has been
responsible for
the deaths of tens of millions of your fellow human beings and the
enslavement
of nearly a billion more. Like Hitler, Lenin sat up nights in a dank
garret
scheming how he could conquer the world. We know that too.
Is
it not theoretically possible that a billionaire could be sitting, not
in a
garret, but in a penthouse, in Manhattan, London or Paris and dream the same dream as
Lenin and
Hitler? You will have to admit it is theoretically possible. Julius
Caesar, a
wealthy aristocrat, did. And such a man might form an alliance or
association
with other like-minded men, might he not? Caesar did. These men would
be
superbly educated, command immense social prestige and be able to pool
astonishing amounts of money to carry out their purposes. These are
advantages
that Hitler and Lenin did not have.
Only the brightest and clairvoyant individuals could envisage the effects of bizarre "soul searching" of such dreamers born with a silver spoon. For example, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in 1915 testified about the dangers that could arise from individuals and powerful philanthropic organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation with their controlling special-interest influence masked as benevolence:
There develops within the State a state so powerful that the existing ordinary social and industrial forces are insufficient to cope with it. … Their power is inconsistent with our democratic aspirations.
Alas, nobody so far came with ideas what to do about that danger.
The
main quotes of Professor Carroll Quigley
the author of "Tragedy and Hope",
1966
The
powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing
less than
to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to
dominate
the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a
whole.
This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central
banks of
the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in
frequent
private meetings and conferences. (Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and
Hope, p. 324.
1966.)
There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international
Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the
radical Right
believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may
identify as
the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the
Communists, or
any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations
of this
network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted
for two
years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I
have no
aversion to it or to most of its instruments. I have objected, both in
the past
and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief
difference
of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role
in history
is significant enough to be known. (Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy &
Hope: A
History of the World in Our Time, p. 950. 1964.)
“The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a
society
which originated in England [and] believes national boundaries should
be
obliterated and one-world rule established.” (Georgetown University Professor Carroll
Quigley,
Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time, p. 95
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals
and
policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is
a
foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers.
Instead,
the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American
people can
‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any
profound or extensive shifts in policy. (Georgetown University
Professor
Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, pp. 1247-1248 )
A Patriot
and
former CFR member speaks out (also here)
Johnny Eugine Stewart: F.R.E.E. Founder (by
Eric
Samuelson)
"The
difference between Democrats and Republicans is: Democrats have
accepted some
ideas of socialism cheerfully, while Republicans have accepted them
reluctantly."
(1962)
The fragments of the book "Tragedy and Hope" related to the quotes above
More very telling quotes (from SFTOBEY)
We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would
have
been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world
is now
more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The
supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely
preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries.
David Rockefeller, Bilderberger Conference, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret
cabal
working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing
my
family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others
around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic
structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand
guilty, and I am proud of it.
David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the
right major
crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.
David Rockefeller
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to
restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true
if they
were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real
or
promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all
peoples of
the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing
every man
fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual
rights will
be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted
to them
by the World Government.
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1992
US must not stop Syrian resettlement. It would be a threat to ‘global
governance’.
David Miliband,
former British Foreign Secretary
who came to New York in 2013 to take the reins of the
International Rescue
Committee
This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan, which
calls for a
gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the
goal of one
world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.
Zbignew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter
I have often said that the use of a
university is to
make young gentlemen as unlike their fathers as possible.
Woodrow Wilson, Princeton University, 1914
The purpose of a college education is to question your father's values.
James O. Freedman, Dartmouth College, 2002
Every child in America entering school at the age of
five is
insane because he comes to school with certain allegiances to our
founding
fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a
belief in a
supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a
separate
entity. It's up to you as teachers to make all these sick children well
–
by creating the international child of the future.
Dr. Chester M. Pierce, Psychiatrist,
address to the Childhood International Education Seminar, 1973
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds
of men
their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism
and
religious dogmas…
G. Brock Chisholm, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health
We ... ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and
difference
from others ... . And that's precisely what the European Union, in my
view,
should be doing its best to undermine.
States have to become more open states, in terms of the people who
inhabit
them"; "sovereignty is an illusion ... sovereignty is an absolute
illusion that has to be put behind us.
Peter Sutherland, UN migration chief & chairman at
Goldman Sachs bank,
who wants to use (Muslim) immigration to destroy European countries’
culture
If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a
deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations
upon the
sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign
independent
States which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth
and divide
the political allegiance of mankind. It is just because we are really
attacking
the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our
loyalty to it
so loudly. … I will merely repeat that we are at present working,
discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political
force called
sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our
world. And
all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our
hands…
Arnold Toynbee,
Address to the 1931 Copenhagen conference;
"International Affairs" , Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (November 1931)
See also "Roseanne, the Red Queen"
White men must be stopped: The very future of mankind depends on it - Ms. Melinda Gates (the wife of Bill Gates)
Those of us of European stock will be the minority in less than two years, and, that's a good thing. - Joe Biden
A few
sobering conclusions
"Premonition"
Decades
ago back in the 1970s of the former USSR (however long after the Stalin
nightmare) people did not fear their own shadows any more, and some
aspects of
the grotesque Soviet political system could be already discussed (in
kitchens).
Soviet propaganda machine typically bragged as though the Soviet
political
system were the most democratic in the world (!) – that is while having
only
one (Communist) party allowed, and always having only one
no contest
candidate for each and every elected position at all levels!
Yet authors singing Hosanna about the Soviet freedom and elections did
not even
realize the idiocy of their claims about such a grotesquely idiotic
electoral
system!
In that time it came to my mind: Why do not the Soviet leaders
agree to
maintain several (equally "loyal") candidates for every
position, and why do not they permit and maintain also a second party
(a kind
of a communist too) – in order to offer a fake alternative and
an
illusion of a choice in an illusion of election?! Then their bragging
about
democratic elections would be formally valid, yet they would not lose
even one
iota of their totalitarian control...
Little did I know then, that exactly such a system of fake parties
and
their cadre of nomenclatura already existed in America,
established
incrementally in small steps, near unnoticed by anybody, without any
preceding
decades of Stalin terror and GULAGs... Shame to America! (But the American
people, especially the patriotic ones, simply do not want to hear or
believe
any bad news about their country – Eric Samuelson).
Conclusions
The reality of
the new age
with its enormous production potential is that some individuals are
capable to
generate and own a wealth in a matter of tens of billions dollars.
Moreover,
they can also establish international clubs, international parties, and
other
organizations controlling near the entire wealth of the world. Being in
such a
position, not only can they pursue the usual goal of the rich
to
accumulate even more wealth, but they can also have and pursue any
kinds of unusual
bizarre agendas in accordance with their bizarre world views.
The most sad and
depressing
part of it is that with such enormous financial means they project
their power
onto every nation of their choice implementing the desired changes and
their
bizarre world views unobstructed, without any resistance.
Moreover...
Beside private
clubs,
there are also a few despotic or totalitarian nations capable
to easily
redirect huge amounts of their national budgets into any kind of
nefarious
"projects" undermining other nations. So did the former
Alas, not much
can be done in
free and open nations of the West against such an enormous financial,
corrupting, and lobbing pressure from outside coupled with the
erosion
of values and progressive sabotage from inside. A normal method
of
resistance against such a destructive force in a parliamentary republic
supposed to be opposition parties fighting against this
destructive
force, and at least a few congressmen representing and speaking out for
these
parties in the parliament. To keep speaking out and to keep the goals
of this
fight on the table is the very minimum required for winning the fight
in some
future.
Unfortunately,
as of now, except the Judeo-Christian America party, we have not one
truly
oppositional party, nor any congressmen speaking out for such a party.
Regretfully, the US Congress functions not much differently than the
former
Soviet one party "Congress". This dysfunctional mode of operation was
achieved by
various methods of ignoring or suppression of freedom of speech
examined in
items 2-8 of FAQ. Thus, even that limited
potential of
resistance against NWO which in theory is available in our Republic, is
disabled by this very NWO and the ill traditions of our political
system.
Therefore, the first thing to do is to abandon the idiotic deficiency
of the
American political mindset (see FAQ), to
establish
parties which do speak out, to elect at least one or two congressmen
that do
speak out for such parties, and to resuscitate the real free speech and
real
parliementarism. In a real parliementarism no issue can be tabooed or
removed
from public discussions: on the contrary, all such issues are always on
the
table and discussed as long as it takes. At the very least! Most of the
tabooed
topics cannot withstand any honest discussion – and this is exactly the
reason why they got tabooed...
Alexander Gofen
More references
The Naked Communist Agenda
(1958)
Never before...
Pope's
Bilderberger Guru
Compendium
by Fedoseev
(Анатолий
Павлович
Федосеев, 1910-2001),
compiled in 1982 (in Russian) based on the 5 books below:
Gary Allen, "None dare call
it
conspiracy" (full text)
Quigley,
"Tragedy and Hope"
Gary
Allen, "The Rockefeller's File"
Gary
Allen, "Kissinger"
Robert
Eringer, "The Global Manipulators"
http://www.wnd.com/2017/08/marxist-infiltration-in-america-virtually-complete/
Socialism's infiltration into America really began with the Frankfurt
School, according to Sasser.
This collection of Marxist intellectuals fled Nazi Germany and settled
in New York’s Columbia University in 1935.
This long march through the institutions has been going on a long time;
it’s virtually complete.
So here I am being pessimistic, I think it may be too late. And I'm supposed
to be optimistic, but I can't be. I’m a historian, so I look at this
and say, "It's too late".
Who
stole our culture: the origin of the "cultural Marxism" - by
William S. Lind
http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/who-owns-the-future-globalists-or-nationalists/
(Pat Buchanan)
This
free-trade, open-borders cult first flowered in 19th-century Britain.
The St. Paul of this post-Christian faith was Richard Cobden, who
mesmerized elites with the grandeur of his vision and the power of his
rhetoric. In Free Trade Hall in Manchester, Jan. 15, 1846, the crowd
was so immense the seats had to be removed. There, Cobden thundered:
“I look farther; I see in the Free
Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the
principle of gravitation in the universe – drawing men together,
thrusting aside the antagonisms of race, and creed, and language, and
uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.”